The SMART Trial.

Not all TAVR is the same.


Evolut™ TAVR delivers superior valve performance in women with small annuli at 2 years vs. SAPIEN™* platform†,1


Discover the data


Exclamation icon Indications, Safety, and Warnings
Tavr patients and Evolut valve

Evolut™ TAVR – proven for women.†,1-3


If women do receive TAVR treatment, they have a lower mortality rate compared to SAVR.2 If treated with Evolut TAVR, women with small annulus experience better valve performance compared to the SAPIEN™* platform through 2 years.†,1


Explore the data.


Through 2 years, Evolut™ TAVR maintains superior valve performance vs. SAPIEN™* TAVR in women with small annuli.
Chart 1
Chart 2
TAVR risks may include, but are not limited to, death, stroke, damage to the arteries, bleeding, and need for permanent pacemaker.

Compared to SAPIEN TAVR,

only Evolut TAVR delivers:

Discover the data


Chart 3
TAVR risks may include, but are not limited to, death, stroke, damage to the arteries, bleeding, and need for permanent pacemaker.
Play button Smart Trial video
Smart Trial

About the SMART Trial


The SMART Trial is a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial conducted to understand how valve design differences between the Medtronic self-expandable Evolut™ platform and Edwards Lifesciences balloon-expandable SAPIEN™* transcatheter aortic valve replacement system affect treatment of small aortic annulus (≤ 430 mm2) patients with symptomatic, severe native-aortic stenosis.


† Based on the 2-year follow-up results from the SMART clinical trial, which demonstrated differences in valve performance for Evolut compared with SAPIEN* and no differences in safety outcomes. SMART primarily enrolled patients with small annuli, the majority of whom were women.¹ Additional clinical trials evaluating women across a range of annulus sizes have shown lower mortality at 1 year for women treated with TAVR compared with surgical valve replacement,2 with comparable mortality through 5 years in a separate study.3

‡ Valve performance as defined as freedom from bioprosthetic valve dysfunction (BVD) through 24 months. BVD is defined as a composite including any of the following: hemodynamic structural valve dysfunction (mean gradient ≥ 20 mmHg), non-structural valve dysfunction (severe prothesis-patient mismatch or ≥ moderate aortic regurgitation), clinical thrombosis, endocarditis, and aortic valve reintervention.

¶ In patients with small annuli (area ≤ 430 mm2) in all-comers trial, consisting of majority low surgical risk participants (52.1%).


  1. Bleiziffer S, on behalf of SMART Trial Investigators. Two-year outcomes for Women in the Five-year SMART Trial. Presented at AHA 2025; November 8, 2025; New Orleans, USA.
  2. Skelding, KA, et al. Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Versus Surgery in Women at High Risk for Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement (from the CoreValve US High Risk Pivotal Trial). Am J Cardiol, 2016. 118(4): p. 560-6.
  3. Wykrzykowska, J. Sex-specific Outcomes at 5 Years in the Evolut Low Risk Trial. Presented at PCR London Valves 2025; November 17, 2025; London, UK.

US-CV-2501213 v2.0 02/2026